O
Ann Arbor
← Community
DevelopmentCommunity discussion

Anti-Displacement Plan (DC-4)

Ann Arbor

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (5)

At a glance

Public comments
5
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 15, 2026.

Public comments (5)

OpposedRichard DokasJun 15, 2026

Said the comp plan's transition zones target his fourth-ward neighborhood of small, affordable homes and elderly, fixed-income residents, and that no one consulted the neighborhood.

City Council — June 15, 2026 · 30:46 →
OpposedKitty KahnJun 15, 2026

Called DC-4 ironic — hiring consultants to fix problems the comp plan creates — and urged a no vote and reconsideration of the comp plan.

City Council — June 15, 2026 · 34:01 →
OpposedKathy BorisJun 15, 2026

Asked what DC-4's purpose is — admission, apology, or political play — and asked council to fold displacement protections into the comp plan instead.

City Council — June 15, 2026 · 37:08 →
OpposedJohn GodfreyJun 15, 2026

Called DC-4 a hollow, performative, consultant-driven gesture made in election season, after residents warned of gentrification during the comp plan process.

City Council — June 15, 2026 · 42:36 →
OpposedRalph McKeeJun 15, 2026

Said the comp plan's transition zones incentivize displacement, a consultant will fix the other consultant's plan, and called it one of the most cynical political moves he's seen.

City Council — June 15, 2026 · 45:32 →