O
Ann Arbor
← Community
Public SafetyCommunity discussion

Worship buffer ordinance

Ann Arbor

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (6)Opposed (1)

At a glance

Public comments
7
Last 30 days
7

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Nov 5, 2026.

Public comments (7)

SupportiveNadab KaneNov 5, 2026

The Beth Israel rabbi supported the ordinance but suggested the 50-foot buffer may be too small for Ann Arbor's layout and asked whether sign quantity could count as intimidation.

City Council — November 5, 2026 · 1:41:06 →
SupportiveJudy CohnNov 5, 2026

A longtime Beth Israel member described two decades of intimidation at services and asked for some kind of buffer.

City Council — November 5, 2026 · 1:43:20 →
SupportiveJoan LowensteinNov 5, 2026

The Jewish Federation president called the ordinance 'a tool' that still requires police and security cooperation, and thanked Mayor Taylor.

City Council — November 5, 2026 · 1:46:15 →
OpposedBlaine ColemanNov 5, 2026

Opposed the ordinance as a First Amendment suspension around Beth Israel and said the issue is the messaging, not the presence.

City Council — November 5, 2026 · 57:41 →
SupportiveGerald SorakNov 5, 2026

The Beth Israel executive director said nobody questions the protesters' First Amendment rights — they just want members and guests to enter without fear of harassment.

City Council — November 5, 2026 · 1:56:54 →
SupportiveLuis VasquezNov 5, 2026

Said there's a world of difference between protest and harassment, noting a protester once carried a swastika sign.

City Council — November 5, 2026 · 1:58:39 →
SupportiveAlex LoweNov 5, 2026

Called the ordinance 'a perfectly reasonable time, place, and manner restriction' and said harassing worship week after week for decades goes beyond protest.

City Council — November 5, 2026 · 2:02:58 →